To the Editor,
I read with interest Mr. Russell’s comments on the recently completed Master Plan and its predecessor, Master Plan 2000. I’m quite familiar with Master Plan 2000, having served on the Board that generated it, and feel that Mr. Russell’s criticism that "its Goal Statements are not a plan" may have missed the point. Master Plans endeavor to capture, refine and express community sentiment, but plans are aspirational guidelines after all; they are only statements of intent. Whether they are detailed or general is secondary to whether they can be implemented and succeed. A plan – regardless of length – must translate into action and be measured by the beneficial changes that it generates.
In defense of Master Plan 2000 I’ve listed abbreviated versions of its five Goal Statements, along with actions taken to advance them:
Goal 1 Preserve the character, scale, charm of the Town...
Goal 3 Make downtown more accessible and attractive; support businesses…
Goal 2 Protect environmentally sensitive areas; Develop an overlay plan for coastal areas...
Goal 4 Coastal Areas Overlay:
Goal 5 Balance growth; Respect quality of life…
In addition to effecting Masterplan 2000 Goals, the Planning Board, over two decades, amended the Zoning By-Law regulating Cell Towers; Driveways; Helicopter Landings, Topographical Changes; Windmills; Solar Panels Installations; Regulated Substances; etc.
I wish the current Planning Board success and satisfaction implementing its new Master Plan. Manchester is well-served by its volunteer boards, committees and dedicated staff and the Planning Board was especially fortunate to have had the wise guidance of Jon Witten who served as Town Planner for four decades before moving on to Town Counsel.
Carroll Cabot
Manchester
Mrs. Cabot served on the Manchester Planning Board from 1996 to 2016.